Workshop on Inclusive Communication between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users. In conjunction with MobileHCI 2020, October 5-9, Now Virtual.

References

  1. Andrés Aparicio, Laura Sanz, Gary Burnett, Hans Stoll, Maxim Arbitmann, Martin Kunert, Fabian Flohr, Patrick Seiniger, and Dariu Gavrila. 2017. Advancing active safety towards the protection of vulnerable road users: the PROSPECT project. In 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  2. Felix Becker and Kay W Axhausen. 2017. Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation 44, 6 (2017), 1293–1306.
  3. Alisa Miller Beyer. 2011. Improving student presentations: Pecha Kucha and just plain PowerPoint. Teaching of Psychology 38, 2 (2011), 122–126.
  4. Rupert RA Bourne, Seth R Flaxman, Tasanee Braithwaite, Maria V Cicinelli, Aditi Das, Jost B Jonas, Jill Keeffe, John H Kempen, Janet Leasher, Hans Limburg, and others. 2017. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Global Health 5, 9 (2017), e888–e897.
  5. Mark Colley and Rukzio Rukzio. 2020. Towards a Design Space for External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/3334480.3382844 Accepted.
  6. Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, Ali Askari, and Rukzio Rukzio. 2020. Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/3313831.3376472 Accepted.
  7. Mark Colley, Marcel Walch, Jan Gugenheimer, and Enrico Rukzio. 2019. Including People with Impairments from the Start: External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 307–314. DOI: 10.1145/3349263.3351521
  8. European Commission. 2020. ITS & Vulnerable Road Users. (2020). [Online; accessed: 04-MARCH-2020].
  9. BR Connell, M Jones, R Mace, J Mueller, A Mullick, E Ostroff, J Sanford, E Steinfeld, M Story, and G Vanderheiden. 1997. The principles of universal design, Version 2.0, Raleigh, NC. Center for Universal Design, North Carolina State University (1997).
  10. Shuchisnigdha Deb, Daniel W Carruth, Muztaba Fuad, Laura M Stanley, and Darren Frey. 2019. Comparison of Child and Adult Pedestrian Perspectives of External Features on Autonomous Vehicles Using Virtual Reality Experiment. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Springer, 145–156.
  11. Anna Dickinson, John Arnott, and Suzanne Prior. 2007. Methods for human–computer interaction research with older people. Behaviour & Information Technology 26, 4 (2007), 343–352.
  12. Jenny Ellis and LLC JEBE Consulting. 2014. Bicycle safety education for children from a developmental and learning perspective. Technical Report. United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
  13. Daniel J Fagnant and Kara Kockelman. 2015. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77 (2015), 167–181.
  14. Office for National Statistics. 2019. National population projections: 2018-based. (2019).
  15. James L Fozard and Sandra Gordon-Salant. 2001. Changes in vision and hearing with aging. (2001).
  16. Kai Holländer, Ashley Colley, Christian Mai, Jonna Häkkilä, Florian Alt, and Bastian Pfleging. 2019. Investigating the Influence of External Car Displays on Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2019). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11. DOI: 10.1145/3338286.3340138
  17. Christian P. Janssen, Linda Ng Boyle, Andrew L. Kun, Wendy Ju, and Lewis L. Chuang. 2019a. A Hidden Markov Framework to Capture Human–Machine Interaction in Automated Vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35, 11 (2019), 947–955. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1561789
  18. Christian P Janssen, Stella F Donker, Duncan P Brumby, and Andrew L Kun. 2019b. History and future of human-automation interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 131 (2019), 99–107.
  19. Christian P. Janssen, Shamsi T. Iqbal, Andrew L. Kun, and Stella F. Donker. 2019c. Interrupted by my car? Implications of interruption and interleaving research for automated vehicles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130 (2019), 221–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.004
  20. Andrew L. Kun. 2018. Human-Machine Interaction for Vehicles: Review and Outlook. Foundations and Trends® in Human-Computer Interaction 11, 4 (2018), 201–293. DOI: 10.1561/1100000069
  21. Shuo Li, Phil Blythe, Weihong Guo, and Anil Namdeo. 2019. Investigation of older drivers’ requirements of the human-machine interaction in highly automated vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 62 (2019), 546–563.
  22. Andreas Löcken, Carmen Golling, and Andreas Riener. 2019. How Should Automated Vehicles Interact with Pedestrians? A Comparative Analysis of Interaction Concepts in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 262–274. DOI: 10.1145/3342197.3344544
  23. A. Löcken, P. Wintersberger, A. Frison, and A. Riener. 2019. Investigating User Requirements for Communication Between Automated Vehicles and Vulnerable Road Users. In 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). 879–884. DOI: 10.1109/IVS.2019.8814027
  24. Karthik Mahadevan, Sowmya Somanath, and Ehud Sharlin. 2018. Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 429.
  25. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Yannick Feld, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2018. Augmenting Bicycles and Helmets with Multimodal Warnings for Children. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 15, 13 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3229434.3229479
  26. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Stephen Brewster, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019a. Comparing Unimodal Lane Keeping Cues for Child Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Article 14, 11 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3365610.3365632
  27. Andrii Matviienko, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2019b. NaviBike: Comparing Unimodal Navigation Cues for Child Cyclists. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article Paper 620, 12 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300850
  28. United Nations. 2019a. World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision. www.statista.com/statistics/678737/total-number-of-children-worldwide/. (2019). Accessed: 04-MARCH-2020.
  29. United Nations. 2019b. World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision 10 Key Findings. population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_10KeyFindings.pdf. (2019). Accessed: 04-MARCH-2020.
  30. Trung Thanh Nguyen, Kai Holländer, Marius Hoggenmueller, Callum Parker, and Martin Tomitsch. 2019. Designing for Projection-based Communication between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/3342197.3344543
  31. World Health Organization. 2018. Blindness and vision impairment. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. (2018). Accessed: 07-JUNE-2019.
  32. World Health Organization. 2019. Deafness and hearing loss. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss. (2019). Accessed: 07-SEPTEMBER-2019.
  33. Jennifer A Oxley, Elfriede Ihsen, Brian N Fildes, Judith L Charlton, and Ross H Day. 2005. Crossing roads safely: an experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention 37, 5 (2005), 962–971.
  34. Jeffrey S Passel and D D’Vera Cohn. 2008. US population projections, 2005-2050. Pew Research Center Washington, DC.
  35. Champika Ranasinghe, Stefan Schneegass, Kai Holländer, Rebecca Currano, David Sirkin, Dylan Moore, and Wendy Ju. 2020. Autonomous Vehicle-Pedestrian Interaction Across Cultures: Towards Designing Better External Human Machine Interfaces (eHMIs). In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20). ACM, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. DOI: 10.1145/3334480.3382957. Accepted.
  36. Amir Rasouli, Iuliia Kotseruba, and John K Tsotsos. 2017. Understanding pedestrian behavior in complex traffic scenes. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 3, 1 (2017), 61–70.
  37. WHO/NMH/NVI/18.20. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018: Summary. Status report. World Health Organization, Geneva. www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/.